Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [RRR] Three patches which desperately need reviewers

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RRR] Three patches which desperately need reviewers
Date: 2011-07-14 02:08:19
Message-ID: 1310609299.31101.4.camel@jdavis (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 02:54 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Jul14, 2011, at 02:42 , Josh Berkus wrote:
> > lazy vxid locks
> >
> I can try to review that. It does seems to depend on
> the fastlock patch though, and that patch seems to be
> somewhat of a moving target. I'm thus not sure what the
> most reasonable approach is here. I could wait for the
> fastlock patch to be applied, but since the commitfest
> is drawing to a close that might not be the best course
> of action. How is such a situation handled usually?

Moving target? Hopefully not. I marked it "ready for committer" already.
I did give some feedback, but it's nothing that would get in the way of
reviewing the VXID patch.

So please do take a look at the VXID patch. Just apply it over the last
version of the fastlock patch.

I also plan to take a look, but the earliest will be tomorrow.

	Jeff Davis

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2011-07-14 06:21:19
Subject: Re: lazy vxid locks, v2
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-07-14 01:38:02
Subject: Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2011-07-15 18:51:40
Subject: Re: Three patches which desperately need reviewers
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2011-07-14 01:19:29
Subject: Re: Three patches which desperately need reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group