| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Kohei Kaigai <kohei(dot)kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object |
| Date: | 2011-07-05 14:49:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1309876827-sup-5730@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 05 10:19:18 -0400 2011:
> Hmm, OK. I guess what I'm not sure about is - how much should we
> worry about the fact that this creates several more shared (and
> therefore nailed?) system catalogs? Anyone have an opinion on that?
"Several"? That would worry me, given that we currently have a small
number (eight currently). If it's just one more, I don't think it's
such a big deal. I'm not sure what you mean by nailed though -- I mean,
for example pg_shdescription is shared but not nailed in the rd_isnailed
sense of the word, AFAICS.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-07-05 14:51:51 | Re: Small SSI issues |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-05 14:47:03 | Re: pgsql: Move Trigger and TriggerDesc structs out of rel.h into a new rel |