Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Discussion - Search Objects

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Date: 2011-06-16 19:48:18
Message-ID: 1308253698.2036.4.camel@laptop (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject,
> because all of them modifies something.

No, see dlgFindAndReplace.

>  When I started working I had no clear picture about the class
> hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. I can
> change the prefix if this is wished. 

Yeah, I think it would be better.

> btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting the
> dialog correctly?

Seems good to me. My only question is: why in frmMain.ccp and not in
frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was surprised to find
it in the former.

BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks.



In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-06-16 19:54:51
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2011-06-16 19:42:06
Subject: Re: wrong sql code for fk covering index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group