| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Date: | 2011-06-16 19:48:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1308253698.2036.4.camel@laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject,
> because all of them modifies something.
No, see dlgFindAndReplace.
> When I started working I had no clear picture about the class
> hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. I can
> change the prefix if this is wished.
>
Yeah, I think it would be better.
> btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting the
> dialog correctly?
>
Seems good to me. My only question is: why in frmMain.ccp and not in
frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was surprised to find
it in the former.
BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks.
Regards.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-06-16 19:54:51 | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-06-16 19:42:06 | Re: wrong sql code for fk covering index |