| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David E(dot) Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ITYM DROP TABLE |
| Date: | 2011-06-14 19:14:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1308078829-sup-6259@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 14 13:04:30 -0400 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Done that way (9.0 and beyond).
>
> Re-reading the actual commit, I notice that there's now a grammatical
> problem: the following sentence says
>
> It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
> overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
>
> which was okay when "it" referred to "ALTER TABLE", but now that there
> are two commands mentioned in the previous sentence, it doesn't match.
> Perhaps "These commands also avoid the ...".
Yeah, fixed.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-14 19:25:14 | Re: psql describe.c cleanup |
| Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-06-14 19:11:45 | Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost |