Re: Branch 1.14?

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Date: 2011-06-14 18:50:10
Message-ID: 1308077410.2008.0.camel@laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> >> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > PostgreSQL already created a 9.1 branch, so that new features could be
> >> > commited on head. Actually, there'll be a commitfest starting tomorrow.
> >> > Should we also create a new branch, so that new features could be
> >> > applied on head?
> >> >
> >> > I have no features right now to commit and push, but it could be
> >> > interesting nevertheless.
> >>
> >> If there's nothing to commit, then all it means it that we'll have to
> >> start double-patching bugfixes for no gain.
> >>
> >
> > OK, so we open it as soon as we have a commit to push?
>
> Yes.
>

Seems good to me. I don't expect to have new features soon anyway,
except the Luis's project.

--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jasmin Dizdarevic 2011-06-14 18:57:15 Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-06-14 14:25:32 Re: Branch 1.14?