Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Date: 2010-05-31 15:08:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 31 May 2010 09:33, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> We're currently at 4 weeks since last beta, with no new beta in sight.
>> My understanding was beta 2 would be out on 7th June.  Is that changing?

> Yes, but Simon is correct in that 4-5 weeks between betas is a long time, 

The reason it went like that is that (a) we had PGCon in there, and (b)
we had a set of security releases in there.  Asking for another beta
to have happened is pointless.  You might recall that I already *did*
ask that --- I wanted beta2 to happen concurrently with the security
releases --- and was turned down.

I find myself entirely unimpressed by proposals to make releases
according to some rigid schedule that takes no account of whether
packaging manpower is actually available.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Shrish PurohitDate: 2010-05-31 15:09:18
Subject: Index only scans
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-05-31 15:07:15
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group