Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 08:01:48
Message-ID: 1306828908.6396.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-05-30 at 22:43 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> One of the conclusions the study group came to was that there should
> be good integration between the tracker system and the SCM. That was
> in the days before distributed SCMs were common, and in a commercial
> context, so I'm not sure how well our reasoning would stand up for the
> current context, but I see it's been mentioned elsewhere and I think
> it's a significant consideration, at least.

What kind of functionality would (good) SCM integration provide?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-05-31 08:01:49 Re: adding applications to the stack builder
Previous Message Leonardo Francalanci 2011-05-31 07:39:38 Re: switch UNLOGGED to LOGGED