| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: eviscerating the parser |
| Date: | 2011-05-21 16:13:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1305994398-sup-2641@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 20 18:41:37 -0400 2011:
> This means that, in a situation where aren't using DML, and are
> running very simple queries without prepared statements, the parser
> bloat resulting from supporting all the other kinds of queries which
> aren't being exercised by the tests results in a slowdown of
> approximately 0.7%.
So the point here is, we do not need to worry about adding new keywords,
because the performance impact is really minimal. Right?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2011-05-21 16:49:47 | Re: Pull up aggregate subquery |
| Previous Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-05-21 15:59:05 | Re: Review: psql include file using relative path |