Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date: 2011-05-07 21:26:56
Message-ID: 1304803616.15989.24.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2011-05-07 at 17:16 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> pg_config is useful quite apart from its use in building things, as was
> discussed upthread.

Link please.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-05-07 21:32:41 Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-05-07 21:24:52 Re: Prefered Types