Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: Josh Williams <joshwilliams(at)ij(dot)net>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>, Ian Bailey-Leung <ian(at)hardcircle(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-04 22:15:22
Message-ID: 1304547322.5041.117.camel@endpoint
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 00:52 +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> If we could a word that starts with H after Write, the feature would be
> "WHAT"
>
> Sorry, could not resist. I just remembered HOT.

Contents Outside Ordinary Logging tables?

(shrug) :)

-- Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-05-04 23:14:49 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2011-05-04 21:52:08 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-05-04 23:05:54 Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-05-04 22:04:03 Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype