Re: pgbench and timestamps (bounced)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Soler <jaime(dot)soler(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgbench and timestamps (bounced)
Date: 2021-01-13 19:55:19
Message-ID: 1304503.1610567719@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
>> What remains that we could do now, and perhaps back-patch, is point (2)
>> i.e. disallow digits as the first character of a pgbench variable name.

> I'm fine with that.

>> That would be enough to "solve" the original bug report, and it does seem
>> like it could be back-patched, while we're certainly not going to risk
>> back-patching anything as portability-fraught as introducing mutexes.

> Sure.

OK. I've pushed a patch that just does that much, and marked the
commitfest entry closed. After the other thing lands, please rebase
and resubmit what remains of this patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-01-13 20:26:45 Re: pg_preadv() and pg_pwritev()
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-01-13 19:52:04 Re: pg_preadv() and pg_pwritev()