| From: | Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh(dot)widu(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Order of tables |
| Date: | 2011-05-04 05:30:58 |
| Message-ID: | 1304487058290-4369093.post@n5.nabble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Heikki Linnakangas-3 wrote:
>
> On 28.04.2011 12:20, Rishabh Kumar Jain wrote:
>> How the tables must be ordered in the list of tables in from statement?
>
> There is no difference in performance, if that's what you mean. (If not,
> then pgsql-novice or pgsql-sql mailing list would've be more appropriate)
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
I understood that now but I have one more query.
In what manner are explicit joins added to improve performence?
Are there some rules for it?
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Order-of-tables-tp4346077p4369093.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jesper Krogh | 2011-05-04 05:33:25 | Re: [PERFORMANCE] expanding to SAN: which portion best to move |
| Previous Message | Rishabh Kumar Jain | 2011-05-04 05:29:26 | Re: Order of tables |