Re: pg_upgrade bug found!

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: RhodiumToad on IRC <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade bug found!
Date: 2011-04-07 21:26:05
Message-ID: 1302211565.19211.9.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 17:06 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I want to avoid anything that requires a compile because they are hard
> for many sites to install so TransactionIdPrecedes() is out. We will
> need to do this in PL/pgSQL probably.

PL/pgSQL can't see dead rows, so that would not be correct. It's
guaranteed to be the same value you see from the heap or newer; because
if it's not visible in the heap, it's not going to be visible in the
toast table.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-04-07 21:32:13 Re: pg_upgrade bug found!
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-07 21:23:10 Re: Typed-tables patch broke pg_upgrade