Re: Major features for 9.1

From: Gilberto Castillo Martínez <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, lardinois(at)gmail(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1
Date: 2011-04-04 12:51:40
Message-ID: 1301921500.25075.7.camel@gilbertoc.mtcorp.etecsa.cu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

>
> > when it comes to SSI I am not finding any explanations
> > for this acronym.
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Serializable
>
> It's about a technique for serializable transactions which doesn't
> add any blocking beyond what is present in snapshot isolation. In
> contrast, most serializable implementations which provide true
> serializability do this by blocking conflicting transactions. A
> description of the SSI technique was first published in the 2008 ACM
> SIGMOD, with independent confirmation of some of the published
> performance improvements compared to traditional S2PL serializability
> by an ACM committee. While two prototype implementations were
> developed to support academic papers on the topic, we believe this is
> the first production-quality implementation. It includes many
> innovations which were not described in any academic papers on the
> topic.

Excelent!1

The News:
It's about a technique for serializable transactions which doesn't
add any blocking beyond what is present in snapshot isolation.It includes many
innovations which were not described in any academic papers on the
topic.

--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
Edificio Beijing. Miramar Trade Center. Etecsa.
Miramar, La Habana.Cuba.

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 179 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2011-04-04 15:13:37 Re: Major features for 9.1
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-04-04 12:39:00 Re: Major features for 9.1