Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthew Draper <matthew(at)trebex(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name
Date: 2011-03-28 20:18:16
Message-ID: 1301343496.17107.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2011-03-26 at 09:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> You can't be guaranteed that they won't standardize something
> incompatible no matter what we do. We could choose to do it as you've
> proposed and they could then standardize some weird syntax - the => is
> a fairly relevant example of exactly that.

The matter of how to resolve SQL parameter names is already
standardized. See clause on <identifier chain>.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-03-28 20:40:41 Re: Open issues for collations
Previous Message David Fetter 2011-03-28 20:09:44 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove more SGML tabs.