Re: psql \dt and table size

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql \dt and table size
Date: 2011-03-25 15:55:52
Message-ID: 1301068512-sup-3412@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of vie mar 25 02:48:49 -0300 2011:
> 2011/3/24 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> >> can we enhance a detail for table and show more accurate numbers?
> >>
> >> table size: xxx
> >> toast size: xxx
> >> indexes size: xxx
> >
> > Only if we don't mind going beyond 80 columns.
>
> sure, it is on new lines

That could get very long ... are you proposing something like
\d++ ?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2011-03-25 15:58:57 Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-25 15:51:44 Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable