Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3

From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
Date: 2006-04-06 15:39:07
Message-ID: 12F0B58E-6764-4333-B412-A5D66DF6AAC7@khera.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Apr 6, 2006, at 12:47 AM, Leigh Dyer wrote:

> I'm sure those little SAS drives would be great for web servers and
> other non-IO-intensive tasks though -- I'd love to get some X4100s
> in to replace our Poweredge 1750s for that. It's a smart move
> overall IMHO,

For this purpose, bang for the buck would lead me to getting Dell
1850 with hardware RAID and U320 drives. The quick-n-dirty tests
i've seen on the FreeBSD mailing list shows the disks are much faster
on the 1850 than the X4100 with its SAS disks.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2006-04-06 16:17:39 Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2006-04-06 15:36:41 Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3