Re: kqueue backend for pgbench

From: Roman Khapov <rkhapov(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: kqueue backend for pgbench
Date: 2026-10-28 05:50:32
Message-ID: 12B59C9C-2F60-4042-A5E1-CFE9E907B73D@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> We regularly test with couple of thousand clients. But we have to set -j
> matching number of -c because otherwise pgbench is bottleneck itself.

To achieve max TPS we do the same thing, but sometimes there must be
clients >> threads, ex: testing the connection overhead itself and pool management
cost in poolers :)

> pgbench definitely needs more love.

fully agree :)

--
Best regards,
Roman Khapov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-10-28 05:57:42 Re: Fix stale relcache fields for TOAST indexes during REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message jian he 2026-10-28 05:37:36 Re: SQL/JSON DEFAULT ON ERROR/ON EMPTY evaluation fail should rethrow error unconditionally