Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Grzegorz Przeździecki <grzegorz_przezdziecki(at)lupus(dot)waw(dot)pl>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum
Date: 1999-11-25 15:17:16
Message-ID: 12989.943543036@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Grzegorz =?iso-8859-2?Q?Prze=BCdziecki?= <grzegorz_przezdziecki(at)lupus(dot)waw(dot)pl> writes:
> vacuum;
> NOTICE: Index tb_klienci_id_klienci_key: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (8776)
> IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (8774)

There are some bugs here that we are looking into fixing for 7.0.
In the meantime, you should be able to get rid of the message by
dropping and recreating that index.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-11-25 15:47:20 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ':' and ';' operators
Previous Message Karel Zak - Zakkr 1999-11-25 13:43:20 PgAccess - small bug?