Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Date: 2011-02-12 18:13:50
Message-ID: 1297534430.27157.672.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers

On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 18:53 +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > It sure seems like
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and
> > should be improved, in general.. If this module is really still just a
> > test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal..
>
> No, it's quite useful and used in many projects, since it's the only way
> to create multicolumn gist indexes like (tsvector,date).

+1

btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
useful in a practical way.

In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
out-of-the-box in 9.2.

Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If
extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really
necessary.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-02-12 18:58:06 Re: Sorting. When?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-12 17:53:57 Re: SSI bug?

Browse pgsql-rrreviewers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-12 21:45:16 Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2011-02-12 15:53:33 Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)