| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Support for Slony 2.0? |
| Date: | 2011-01-20 18:10:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1295547032.30211.20.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 21:19 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
<snip>
> But before working on this, I want to make sure this won't be a
> useless effort. So I guess I would like to have a final decision on
> this. Do we decide to drop Slony support in 1.14, or do we decide that
> I can work on it, fix it, add support for 2.0, etc.?
<Talk is cheap for me. All I can do is testing.>
...from a PoV of a user or a DBA from field, we need a real GUI that
helps people to setup a Slony-I cluster easily -- or say, as easy as
possible.
So, if it is not too much effort, I'd say we need to support Slony.
Cheers,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-01-20 18:37:32 | Re: Support for Slony 2.0? |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-01-20 07:36:22 | pgAdmin III commit: Disable all widgets in the server dialog... |