Re: Confusing comment in TransactionIdIsInProgress

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusing comment in TransactionIdIsInProgress
Date: 2011-01-19 10:06:09
Message-ID: 1295431569.3282.8710.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:51 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 18.01.2011 07:15, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > Shouldn't the comment read "If first time through"?
> >
> > /*
> > * If not first time through, get workspace to remember main XIDs in. We
> > * malloc it permanently to avoid repeated palloc/pfree overhead.
> > */
> > if (xids == NULL)
> > {
> > ...
> > xids = (TransactionId *) malloc(maxxids * sizeof(TransactionId));
>
> Huh, yes, I'm amazed that no-one have noticed. I must've read that piece
> of code dozens of times in the last couple of years myself, and that
> sentence was even copy-pasted to GetConflictingVirtualXIDs() later in
> that file, including that thinko.

Yes, I laughed when I saw that, having camped out in that code many
nights.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Urbański 2011-01-19 10:09:56 Re: pl/python refactoring
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2011-01-19 09:57:34 Re: pl/python refactoring