Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Date: 2011-01-06 04:55:11
Message-ID: 1294289711.3243.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-01-03 at 11:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> You might want to reflect on rolcatupdate a bit before asserting that
> there are no cases where privileges are ever denied to superusers.

Arguably, the reason that that is hardly documented and slightly
deprecated is that the underlying design decision is questionable.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-01-06 04:59:00 Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-01-06 04:26:26 Re: Avoiding rewrite in ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE