Re: making an unlogged table logged

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: making an unlogged table logged
Date: 2011-01-05 04:13:38
Message-ID: 1294200818.6949.50.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > --
> > Robert Haas
> > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> A couple thoughts:
> 1. Could the making a table logged be a non-exclusive lock if the
> ALTER is allowed to take a full checkpoint?

If possible, that would certainly be better. If the bgwriter is doing
what it is supposed to, it would be relatively painless.

> 2. Unlogged to logged has giant use case.

Agreed.

JD

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru HANADA 2011-01-05 05:52:07 Re: SQL/MED - core functionality
Previous Message Shigeru HANADA 2011-01-05 03:58:36 Re: SQL/MED - core functionality