From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either |
Date: | 2010-12-29 19:42:08 |
Message-ID: | 1293651649-sup-8900@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié dic 29 16:29:45 -0300 2010:
> In practice I think it would make sense if heap_open accepts all
> relation types on which you can potentially do either a heapscan or
> indexscan (offhand those should be the same set of relkinds, I think;
> so this is the same in effect as Heikki's proposal, but phrased
> differently). So it would have to start rejecting views, and we'd need
> to go looking for the consequences of that.
This seems a very good idea, but I think we shouldn't let it sink the
current patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-12-29 20:00:12 | Re: Extensions, patch v16 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-29 19:29:45 | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either |