| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| Date: | 2010-12-27 20:03:55 |
| Message-ID: | 1293479926-sup-9075@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter Geoghegan's message of lun dic 27 16:13:33 -0300 2010:
> I hope that we don't make the mistake of not checking for collisions
> with C++0x keywords, for which GCC 4.3+ has partial support. The new
> standard is almost complete, so it will probably become a lot more
> relevant soon. There are quite a few new keywords in C++0x, including:
>
> constexpr
> decltype
> nullptr
> static_assert
I think only constexpr is being currently used from this list, and it's
easily fixed because it's not exposed beyond a single file.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-27 20:12:34 | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2010-12-27 19:48:50 | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Николай Ижиков | 2010-12-27 20:06:55 | Re: Archlinux, ossp-uuid |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-12-27 19:51:43 | Re: Reduce lock levels for ADD and DROP COLUMN |