Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation
Date: 2010-12-25 18:42:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On lör, 2010-12-25 at 06:33 -0800, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> I could post in this email, some before after changes, but those would
> be my perceptions.  I was shown to use GIT with SGL but I am reviewing
> the PDF, and therefore the determination of the corresponding SGL is a
> lot of work. 

Perhaps you can think of some other way to mark changes in a PDF
document that someone else can then review and process further, keeping
in mind that most of us like to work with open-source tools.

> What I was after was a to be advised how to arrange peer review of
> some changes that I felt were touchups to the documentation. How to
> identify these peers and to get my recommended touchups to them, as
> well as feedback.

This mailing list is your peer. :-)  Send your things here.

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Leslie S SatensteinDate: 2010-12-27 01:28:56
Subject: Words missing in the following txt
Previous:From: Leslie S SatensteinDate: 2010-12-25 14:33:49
Subject: This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group