From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Leslie S Satenstein <lsatenstein(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation |
Date: | 2010-12-25 18:42:00 |
Message-ID: | 1293302520.12491.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On lör, 2010-12-25 at 06:33 -0800, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> I could post in this email, some before after changes, but those would
> be my perceptions. I was shown to use GIT with SGL but I am reviewing
> the PDF, and therefore the determination of the corresponding SGL is a
> lot of work.
Perhaps you can think of some other way to mark changes in a PDF
document that someone else can then review and process further, keeping
in mind that most of us like to work with open-source tools.
> What I was after was a to be advised how to arrange peer review of
> some changes that I felt were touchups to the documentation. How to
> identify these peers and to get my recommended touchups to them, as
> well as feedback.
This mailing list is your peer. :-) Send your things here.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Leslie S Satenstein | 2010-12-27 01:28:56 | Words missing in the following txt |
Previous Message | Leslie S Satenstein | 2010-12-25 14:33:49 | This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation |