Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date: 2010-12-24 23:46:07
Message-ID: 1293234367.30276.184.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 18:26 -0500, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad
> > enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say,
> > search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community.
>
> Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"...
>
> And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less*
> ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to
> keep going back to gmane's search)

I think you kind of missed my point.

JD

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-25 02:11:12 Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-24 23:37:26 Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump