From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
Date: | 2010-12-15 09:06:43 |
Message-ID: | 1292404003.2737.5724.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that would be a recipe for bugs. Look at the three new macros
> I introduced. If you keep relistemp around, then any code which
> relies on it is likely testing for one of those three things, or maybe
> even something subtly different from any of them, as in the cases
> where I needed to add a switch statement. The way I see it, this is
> ultimately a four-level hierarchy
That argument isn't clear enough to avoid me agreeing so far with Tom
and Andrew that logged-ness is separate from temp-ness. As you say
though, it might be a recipe for bugs, so please explain a little more.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-12-15 09:20:41 | Re: unlogged tables |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-12-15 07:20:17 | Re: unlogged tables |