Re: unlogged tables

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Date: 2010-12-15 09:06:43
Message-ID: 1292404003.2737.5724.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that would be a recipe for bugs. Look at the three new macros
> I introduced. If you keep relistemp around, then any code which
> relies on it is likely testing for one of those three things, or maybe
> even something subtly different from any of them, as in the cases
> where I needed to add a switch statement. The way I see it, this is
> ultimately a four-level hierarchy

That argument isn't clear enough to avoid me agreeing so far with Tom
and Andrew that logged-ness is separate from temp-ness. As you say
though, it might be a recipe for bugs, so please explain a little more.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-12-15 09:20:41 Re: unlogged tables
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-15 07:20:17 Re: unlogged tables