Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Date: 2010-12-08 00:32:19
Message-ID: 1291768339.31995.75.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:00 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> xof(at)thebuild(dot)com (Christophe Pettus) writes:
> > On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Because nobody sane uses OSX on the server?
> >
> > The XServe running 10.5 server and 9.0.1 at the other end of the
> > office takes your remark personally. :)
>
> I'd heard that Apple had cancelled XServe. [Poking back at that...]
>
> Yep, they won't be carrying anything for sale that's particularly
> rack-mountable after next January. Not precisely "dead," but definitely
> moving on smelling funny...

A bit off topic but Apple is actually marketing OSX Server on the mini
(with RAID 1). Which honestly for 95% of the businesses out there would
make a very nice, reasonably performant database server for say....
PostBooks, or Drupal.

JD

> --
> (format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "gmail.com")
> http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/emacs.html
> Photons have mass? I didn't know they were catholic!
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-08 00:39:39 Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-08 00:13:34 Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes