| From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Todd Hubers <todd(dot)hubers(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Proposal: Connection Pool Optimization - Change the Connection User |
| Date: | 2021-11-20 17:27:28 |
| Message-ID: | 1291131637429248@sas1-bf93f9015d57.qloud-c.yandex.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Todd!
> I have just joined to start a community consultation process for a proposal. I just finished the proposal document, I spent time writing a Problem and Solution section, and I have done quite a bit of upfront exploration of the code.
>
> See:
>
> * Google Document with Commenting turned on https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u6mVKEHfKtR80UrMLNYrp5D6cCSW1_arcTaZ9HcAKlw/edit?usp=sharing. Feel free to request Edit access.
> * The current PDF version is attached too for archive purposes
I think you are right: the ability to reconnect to the same DB with another user would be beneficial for connection poolers.
Currently, PgBouncer\Odyssey maintains a lot of small pools - one for each user, while having a big one would be great.
From my experience, most of the cost of opening a new server connection comes from a fork() and subsequent CoW memory allocations.
And these expenses would be not necessary if we could just send a new Startup message after the Terminate ('X') message.
But this effectively would empty out out all backend caches.
Yet the feature seems useful from my PoV.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hans Buschmann | 2021-11-20 17:54:30 | AW: VS2022: Support Visual Studio 2022 on Windows |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-11-20 16:16:22 | Re: TOAST - why separate visibility map |