| From: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online checksums patch - once again |
| Date: | 2019-12-25 11:30:54 |
| Message-ID: | 129101577273454@iva8-3634a30a817d.qloud-c.yandex.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
> Attached is a v15 of the online checksums patchset (minus 0005), rebased on top
> of your v3 ProcSignalBarrier patch rather than Andres' PoC GlobalBarrier patch.
> It does take the, perhaps, controversial approach of replacing the SAMPLE
> barrier with the CHECKSUM barrier. The cfbot will be angry since this email
> doesn't contain the procsignalbarrier patch, but it sounded like that would go
> in shortly so opted for that.
ProcSignalBarrier was committed, so online checksums patchset has no other pending dependencies and should be applied cleanly on master. Right? The patchset needs another rebase in this case, does not apply...
regards, Sergei
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-12-25 12:17:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
| Previous Message | Marco Slot | 2019-12-25 11:27:57 | Re: Disallow cancellation of waiting for synchronous replication |