Re: duplicate connection failure messages

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: duplicate connection failure messages
Date: 2010-11-26 19:54:24
Message-ID: 1290801264.12170.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2010-11-26 at 13:27 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On fre, 2010-11-26 at 11:53 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > OK, I updated the code to always use cur_addr in the code --- let me
> > > know if that doesn't fix it.
> >
> > Now it's even more wrong:
> >
> > psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused
> > Is the server running on host "localhost" (???) and accepting
> > TCP/IP connections on port 55555?
> > could not connect to server: Connection refused
> > Is the server running on host "localhost" (232.106.56.8) and accepting
> > TCP/IP connections on port 55555?
>
> Yep, even worse. I have applied the attached patch, which gives me the
> right IPv4 value. I can't test IPv6.

We're back to

psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "localhost" (???) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 55555?
could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "localhost" (127.0.0.1) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 55555?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-11-26 19:56:39 Re: memory leak in libxml2 - fix
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-26 19:19:51 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running