Re: GCC vs clang

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GCC vs clang
Date: 2010-11-16 16:21:48
Message-ID: 1289924508.31200.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-11-16 at 09:41 -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> I've been trying to get clang working enough that I can at
> least get HEAD going for a build farm client, and the attached
> patch is the bare minimum to get it working. There may be a
> better way to do this, but as indicated in a past thread, the
> GNU_SOURCE variable does not play nicely with clang. Getting that
> removed does allow me to do a working make and make check. The make
> takes orders of magnitude longer than gcc does, but that's an
> issue for another day.

The underlying issue in clang has been resolved, so the next release
should work out of the box. I suggest we wait for that.

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5365

In response to

  • GCC vs clang at 2010-11-16 14:41:38 from Greg Sabino Mullane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-11-16 16:32:28 Re: autovacuum maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-11-16 16:12:53 autovacuum maintenance_work_mem