Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables
Date: 2018-01-17 13:51:57
Message-ID: 1288bd6e-b317-9a89-5e84-750a7d1892fd@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm setting this patch to Returned with feedback.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2018-01-17 13:53:47 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: enabling parallel execution for cursors explicitly (experimental)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-01-17 13:49:26 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table