Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-10-27 23:53:55
Message-ID: 1288223635.15416.27.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 19:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I would also agree that the minority of our users will want replication.
> >> The majority of CMD customers, PGX customers, EDB Customers will want
> >> replication but that is by far NOT the majority of our (.Org) users.
> >
> > That just means that *you don't know* how many .org users plan to
> > implement replication, whether it's a minority or majority.
> None of us know. What I do know is that I don't want PostgreSQL to be
> slower out of the box.

Poll TIME!


> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB:
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering |

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-27 23:57:43 Re: max_wal_senders must die
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-27 23:52:38 Re: max_wal_senders must die