Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue oct 21 19:36:07 -0300 2010:
> I'm not immediately sure why plpgsql_subxact_cb is failing to clean up
> correctly in this example, but that seems to be where to look.
I think the reason is that one econtext is pushed for function
execution, and another one for blocks that contain exceptions. The
example function does not contain exceptions -- the savepoints are
handled by the external SQL code.
I'll have a closer look tomorrow.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-10-22 00:32:41|
|Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-10-22 00:22:08|
|Subject: Re: Simplifying replication|