| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: crash in plancache with subtransactions |
| Date: | 2010-10-22 00:26:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1287707071-sup-9015@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue oct 21 19:36:07 -0300 2010:
> I'm not immediately sure why plpgsql_subxact_cb is failing to clean up
> correctly in this example, but that seems to be where to look.
I think the reason is that one econtext is pushed for function
execution, and another one for blocks that contain exceptions. The
example function does not contain exceptions -- the savepoints are
handled by the external SQL code.
I'll have a closer look tomorrow.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-10-22 00:32:41 | Re: max_wal_senders must die |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-10-22 00:22:08 | Re: Simplifying replication |