| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: column-level update privs + lock table |
| Date: | 2010-10-15 07:43:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1287128610.1725.1235.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:41 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I noticed that granting a user column-level update privileges doesn't
> > allow that user to issue LOCK TABLE with any mode other than Access
> > Share.
>
> Anyone think this could be added as a TODO?
Seems so to me, but you raise on Hackers.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bob Pawley | 2010-10-15 10:34:20 | Re: How to determine failed connection attempt due to invalid authorization (libpq)? |
| Previous Message | Martial Braem | 2010-10-15 07:36:09 | Strange phenomenon |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2010-10-15 08:06:32 | Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch |
| Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2010-10-15 07:32:33 | Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch |