Re: SGML doc file references

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Soref <jsoref(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SGML doc file references
Date: 2022-06-17 19:33:51
Message-ID: 1285973.1655494431@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 17.06.22 19:52, Josh Soref wrote:
>> ok, are they worth fixing?

> That would require renaming either the output files or the input files,
> and people would really not like either one.

Agreed that renaming those files is not desirable, but the presented
patch was only fixing erroneous/obsolete comments.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zheng Li 2022-06-17 19:38:03 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-06-17 19:31:58 Re: libpq: Remove redundant null pointer checks before free()