Re: .gitignore files, take two

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: .gitignore files, take two
Date: 2010-09-21 14:38:05
Message-ID: 1285079885.5468.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-09-21 at 00:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 3. What are the ignore filesets *for*, in particular should they list
> just the derived files expected in a distribution tarball, or all the
> files in the set of build products in a normal build?

My personal vote: Forget the whole thing.

I have never found the .cvsignore files useful for anything, but they
have only been a small annoyance when someone else quietly updated them
when I supposedly forget. Some of the new proposed schemes
for .gitignore appear to be significantly more involved.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-21 14:38:29 Re: .gitignore files, take two
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-21 14:31:31 Re: .gitignore files, take two