Re: "serializable" in comments and names

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "serializable" in comments and names
Date: 2010-09-08 16:05:06
Message-ID: 1283961791-sup-3122@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of vie sep 03 19:06:17 -0400 2010:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > +1 for adding parens; we might want to make a function of it
> > someday.
>
> > How about IsolationUsesXactSnapshot
>
> Patch attached.

I find this name confusing :-( Doesn't a READ COMMITTED transaction use
transaction snapshots as well?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-08 16:08:29 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-08 16:03:48 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...