| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS |
| Date: | 2010-09-07 14:49:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1283870946.2517.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
On sön, 2010-09-05 at 22:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > A very similar issue is already documented here:
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/infoschema-triggers.html
>
> That sort of annotation was my first thought, but we'd have to repeat
> ourselves in multiple places because there are several views that are
> affected by the constraint-name issue. (Come to think of it, isn't
> triggered_update_columns also affected by the trigger-name issue?)
>
> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
separate section.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-07 15:56:32 | Re: BUG #5646: missing chunk number 0 for toast |
| Previous Message | missing chunk number | 2010-09-07 09:47:17 | BUG #5646: missing chunk number 0 for toast |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-07 17:12:11 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-07 14:44:08 | Re: Missing utils/fmgroids.h file |