Re: Optimize referential integrity checks (todo item)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimize referential integrity checks (todo item)
Date: 2012-08-27 23:57:31
Message-ID: 12834.1346111851@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:37:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMO the second point is done but the first is not: there's still a
>> question of whether we could remove the trigger-time checks for equality
>> now that there's an upstream filter. Possibly break the TODO entry in
>> two so that you can properly show what's done.

> OK, can someone do this for me?

Done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mali Akmanalp 2012-08-28 00:07:02 Tablefunc crosstab error messages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-08-27 23:43:49 Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points