| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Example indenting |
| Date: | 2010-08-27 17:25:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1282929941.31376.3.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 18:04 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> Something I've noticed is an inconsistency in the SGML markup around
> functions listed in tables. Sometimes the entire function signature
> is considered to be the function, and other times it's just the
> function name, with its parameters outside of the <function> tags.
>
> E.g.:
>
> <function>variance</function>(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)
>
> vs
>
> <function>stddev_samp(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)</function>
>
> Which way is correct? It will make a big difference visually with
> these changes.
That is actually a question for pgsql-docs.
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-27 18:56:04 | SGML on functions |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-27 17:04:36 | Re: [DOCS] Example indenting |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-08-27 19:23:06 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-27 17:04:36 | Re: [DOCS] Example indenting |