Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun ago 23 12:40:32 -0400 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of dom ago 22 12:51:47 -0400 2010:
> >> Do you have a suggestion? Reorder the items?
>
> > I'd add another para before that one saying that this value "also"
> > affects pg_clog truncation. I agree that putting pg_clog truncation as
> > the first item here is not an improvement. For most people, having
> > those pg_clog files there or not is going to be a wash, compared to data
> > size.
>
> I was going to suggest that the point about pg_clog should be in a
> separate paragraph *after* this one, since it seems like a secondary
> issue. But anyway, I agree with putting this para back as it was and
> talking about clog in a separate para.

Sorry, yes, I was also thinking "after". I don't know what made me
write "before" but it wasn't clarity of thought.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support