Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2013-06-24 13:57:24
Message-ID: 12822.1372082244@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Otherwise I think there's not really much left to be done. Fujii?

Well, other than the fact that we've not got MVCC catalog scans yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2013-06-24 14:04:04 Re: Review: UNNEST (and other functions) WITH ORDINALITY
Previous Message Dmitriy Igrishin 2013-06-24 13:55:23 Re: [HACKERS] Frontend/backend protocol improvements proposal (request).