From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kasia Tuszynska <ktuszynska(at)esri(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected? |
Date: | 2010-08-10 19:34:45 |
Message-ID: | 1281468594-sup-9380@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Excerpts from Kasia Tuszynska's message of mar ago 10 15:08:20 -0400 2010:
> Hello Postgres Gurus,
>
> Is it expected behavior for the has_table_privilege postgres function to not handle the user PUBLIC? Or should I submit a bug?
>
> The has_table_privilege function does not handle PUBLIC - the following queries returns the error:
> SELECT has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','SELECT') AS SELECT,
> has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','INSERT') AS INSERT,
> has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','DELETE') AS DELETE,
> has_table_privilege ('PUBLIC','bob.gdb.test1','UPDATE') AS UPDATE;
>
> ERROR: role "PUBLIC" does not exist
Yeah, this is a bug, see
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4399EF7A-9419-4F84-B51A-A55C5EFAC12A%40nasby.net
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Szymon Guz | 2010-08-10 19:35:16 | Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected? |
Previous Message | Kasia Tuszynska | 2010-08-10 19:26:05 | Re: postgres function does not handle PUBLIC - expected? |