From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Manuel Kniep <manuel(at)adjust(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: segmentation fault in execTuples.c#ExecStoreVirtualTuple |
Date: | 2015-01-15 23:57:13 |
Message-ID: | 1281.1421366233@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Manuel Kniep <manuel(at)adjust(dot)com> writes:
>> ok after lots of testing I could create a test case
>> which can be found here https://gist.github.com/rapimo/3c8c1b35270e5854c524
>> its written in ruby an depends on the gem activerecord pg and parallel
> Hm. I don't see a segfault from this. I do see the CREATE TEMP TABLE
> command failing with "ctid is NULL", which probably shouldn't be happening
> ... but no segfault.
The reason turns out to be that this is a dangling-pointer bug, and I was
using a memory-clobber-enabled build so it was pretty predictable what the
pointer would be pointing at. I've got no doubt that hard-to-reproduce
misbehavior, including segfaults, would ensue without CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY
turned on.
You need this patch:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=patch;h=34668c8eca065d745bf1166a92c9efc588e7aee2
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-16 00:06:51 | Re: Bug in pg_dump |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-15 23:47:10 | Re: Safe memory allocation functions |